Monty Python's The Life of Brian Film Analysis

6 pages
1457 words
Carnegie Mellon University
Type of paper: 
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

The film Monty Pythons Life of Brian narrates the story of Brian, an inhabitant of Nazareth who happened to share the birthday with Jesus Christ. The film employed comical tools that distinguished the coincidence, which features a male actor taking the role of Virgin Mary, the cured leper soliciting the public for donations and self-generated songs during the crucifixion. The distinctive style and structure of numerous scenes suggest that the comical style partly motivated the movie, but other incitements precisely brought the message of the film (Reinhartz, 2016). The primary focus of the movie on keen analyzing of the events, period and location demonstrates history creatively and ridicules religious foundations however its cautious with typical Biblical epic style. The film commences with operatic incantation together with the image as it dwindles from black to the night sky, with a shooting star projecting from it.

Three shadows can be viewed from the background resembling male riding camels via the desert covered in moon brightness. The three male who dressed in robes arrives at an old stone town, each carrying adorned case, and heads directly towards an entrance and watch a mother gentleness on her infant. The silently heads towards the mother, so as not to wake the baby, frightens the mother who falls off the chair. Unlike in the biblical setting, she doesnt accept their frankincense, gold, and myrrh (Reinhartz, 2016). The complicated scenes in film deploy humor and historical reality that lets The Life of Brian to explore ancient culture artistically. The historical satire as demonstrated in the film results from failure of individuals not to agree with what Christ said 2000 years ago. This kind religious conflict has led to people victimizing their kind since they basically cannot concur with what Christs message of love and peace. The historical satire in the film is meant to demonstrate the differences between Christs life and the Christian story.

Scenes That Show Historical Satire

The exceptionally childish scenes comprise lisp-distressed Pontious Pilate who asks Brian about his alleged Roman in heritage. Brian answers Pontious Pilate that his dad was Naughtius Maximus, as his mother had told him, which the chief centurion clarifies to Pilate as joke titles like Biggus Dickus or Sillus Soddus. Pilate confesses to having a pal in Rome named Biggus Dickus and marched past his palace trying to evoke a laugh from his guards (Blake, 2017). This scene reveals significant historical implication which remains unfocused on in the story. For instance, two artists are seen for few seconds, tile and paint the huge hall when the scenes start, referring to the historical fact that Pilate attained and changed his Judean palace to Roman when he arrived there. However, the artists in this film have no direct reference and no role other than explicate time-based circumstances which give little knowledge about the filmmakers purpose of the artist in the movie.

The coliseum scene additionally defines the comedic rational of the film by providing a decipherable historical site and discovering witty cultural and social possibilities. The fight on the coliseum floor seems to imitate Roman epic agreements however it operates on a sophisticated level (Thomas, et al. 2012). The Roman classic requires a hero after the soldiers are subjected to the fighting ground while the Python style historical satire is focused on comedy in the film that results from the resistant of the heroic act in favor of consternation.

Lastly, the film ends with the final surrealist performance: the contented musical death. The filmmakers unable to completely suppress throwback, Life of Brian endorses the least anticipated emotion and lyricizes an optimistic outlook of a painful life. The producer proudly exhibits history completely without forgoing petty quarreling, curses, and other unfavorable social qualities all while secretive in their historical setting. Despite the conceptual, social, governmental and religious revolution, human nature remains unaltered.

Blasphemous Scenes

Blasphemy refers to the act of an individual(s) given themselves Gods attributes: their many scenes in the film where blasphemy has been well demonstrating. Firstly, on the site of the movie the wise men are inexplicably following a rising star before identifying the right child and gifting retrieving alms to give to Jesus (Basu, 2014). Unlike, in the Gospel when the three rightfully recognized the Jesus. On the environs of the crowds, a bystander is heard saying that blessed is the cheese-makers, reminding us how it was hard to comprehend Jesus teachings.

Secondly, Brian refutes the allegations that he was the Messiah, an individual among the bystanders pointed claiming that he is the actual true Messiah who is bound to dispute his own identity. Also, Brian is not recognized by his mother, in own her utterances in the movie she claimed that Brian is not Messiah but a naughty boy (Basu, 2014). The crowd persuaded that Brian is the real Messiah gathers up to hear, and he could not tell them otherwise. Brian is not a preacher but is strong echo Jesuss teaching about not avoiding being judgmental and reliance on God to cater for their essentials. The mass followed Brian in determination to make him their leader and storm him as the Messiah in the Bible.

Lastly, the story of Jesus is portrayed in the film although Jesus is not mentioned. In the movie, there is an individual who is convicted of blasphemy and stoned (Basu, 2014). The rationale given in the film behind stoning of this fell, its inscribed that the reason this reminds that the 21st-century Jewish life was ruled by the scriptures.

Evidence of Blasphemy in the Scenes

In the first scene where the bystander assures the rest that cheesemakers are blessed act analogy of the comprehension of Jesus teaching. Mostly in the Bible Jesus used parables to teach the crowds which could be hard for most of them to understand what he was talking about (Blake, 2017). Additionally, although the word is not to be understood it applies to all dairy manufacturers of dairy real; theologically, the Christians are uncomfortable with the kind frequent usage of such biblical opinions.

In the second scene, the scripture states that during all Jesus teachings he did not reveal he was the real Messiah. However, during one his teachings an individual pointed out that he was the Messiah who was to come. In the Bible, Mary his mother also failed to recognize his son, and she thought that he was out his mind (Blake, 2017). This is a film where the mother to Brian said: He is just a naughty boy. The scripture also states where Jesus gathered up to hear the word; he feeds the hungry and also quenched the people with thirst.

The last scene in the Bible they used the Jewish teachings to punish the murders, adulterous, fornicators and hypocrisy. In the film the hypocrite who felled down by a huge stone was punished by the Jewish rules (Blake, 2017); there was no forgiveness, it's insisted on revenge. Therefore, this correlational is an evidence of the blasphemous act.

Moral of the film

In order to expose the morality of Life of Brian movie, its critical to view the narrative and biblical teachings in a spiritual and mystical context. The crucifixion of Jesus was intense and sincere greatest event that ever occurred to the humankind. From the above statement, the historical sense happenings might not have been solemn opposing the conventional art are frequently shown (Thomas, et al. 2012). Dissimilar to all films about Jesus, there may not have been a huge crowd of individual who came to mock and ridicule the savior during his crucifixion. The surroundings were not clean-looking and sanitary as seen in the film. Additionally, Jesus was not hanging on beautiful clothes.

The producers of this film, in my opinion, was not focused in satirizing solemnity and intensity of the actual event but dramatized the honesty that has obscured the facts with the help of art and years of films (Blake, 2017). Lastly, Monty Python exhibits irony and twist, where the audience expects Brian and the colleagues to die, most painful death since no rescue chances would befall them. Nevertheless, they are seen keeping their spirits up, singing joyfully and optimistic. Therefore, in my opinion, the film is not immoral since its only grounded to criticize the turn up of events and Jesus crucifixion and foundation of Christianity.


Basu, L. (2014). Who Can Take a Joke? Life of Brian, Four Lions, and Religious Humour Scandals. Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception, 4(2), 177-206.

Blake, R. A. (2017). Jesus and Brian: Exploring the Historical Jesus and His Times via Monty Pythons Life of Brian., edited by Taylor, Joan E. Religion and the Arts, 21(3), 431-433.

Egan, K., & Thomas, S. (Eds.). (2012). Cult film stardom: offbeat attractions and processes of cultification. Palgrave Macmillan.

Reinhartz, A. (2016). Jesus in Film: Hollywood Perspectives on the Jewishness of Jesus. Journal of Religion & Film, 2(2), 2.

Have the same topic and dont`t know what to write?
We can write a custom paper on any topic you need.

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the website, please click below to request its removal: