Rationale for Women Coaches Fall since Title IX. Essay Example.

The diversity in football arena has taken profound variable modalities that have significantly affected the coaching trends. Gender issues in the presumption of coaching roles have critically hit the headlines in the recent past making instances on what the sports community held as the binding gender balance in sports directorate in the past. The derailing number of women directors in the sports management at different levels has concerted posed concerns on the rationale behind the drastic fall in their number despite the inception of the Title IX legislation.

The Title IX legislation primarily emphasized on the presumption of gender equality in the educational programs (Reifsteck & Brooks, 2011). This law was viewed as a proposition that was bound to open up the participation avenues for women in all directorates inclusive of the sport management platforms. Despite the inception and institution of Title IX, Dana notes in his article that the women leadership in coaches capacity has significantly fallen an aspect that is attributed to some pertinent reasons. Tight budgets, minimal winning trend, the philosophical modalities of coaching and the direction deviations are amongst the rationales attributed to the declining number of women in the coaching capacity. The essence of some women coaches falling victims of groundless firing from their NCAA roles poses a crucial question on the decorum manning the institution of Title IX. The assumption that women are not active coaches compared to their male colleagues and the critical traditional social roles have seen the females coaching career experience drawbacks. Lack of the desired confidence and fear of competition amongst women is also perceived as contributing factor in their fall despite the institution of a very supportive legal framework.

Hiring practices and work-life balance are the fundamental guidelines in career sustenance. According to Dana, the coaches recruitment strategies embodies a stereotypic notion and slant on the gents side thus giving them more credit as opposed to the female gender. More so, the perception that women are mothers in the account that they bear the weight of the family and children on their deliberations creates an avenue of guilty concept. The logic above is presumed to limit the capacity of women discharging their roles promptly thus posing a view of hiring firms inclination onto the males personnel. Women are at some points perceived to delegate their duties to their assistants since their capacity to maintain work-life balance regarding regular and late time practices limits their aggressiveness in coaching (Elfman, 2016). Furthermore, the denial of gender differences by corporations and the athletics department has significantly catalyzed the suppression of women leading to the context of them being treated as outcasts and non-adaptable parties. Jasons intercollegiate reflection article argues that women are evaluated at the same level with men in various corporations, and sports dockets are a replica of the same. According to the author, it is imperative to give moral and administrative support to women through fair recruitment, respectful treatment by castigating and revoking suppressive acts like evidenced in the Millers sacking who served as an epitome to the aspiring women coaches.

In summary, career management issues and the confidence build-up is a fundamental step in progressive developmental strategies lay down as an upcoming coach. The interview of Lyke in Jasons article reveals that to stand out in the career prospect, individuals ought to harbor a sense of inward confidence and establish a profound connection with the people in the same operational platforms.

References

Elfman, L. (2016). Women Coaches Learn Nuances of Networking at Leadership Forum. Women in Higher Education, 25(8), 10-15. doi:10.1002/whe.20341

Https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbelzer/2015/09/02/why-arent-more-women-reaching-the-top-of-college-sports/#64a1d62d1663.

Https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2015/02/23/women-college-coaches-title-9-ix/23917353/.

Reifsteck, E. J., & Brooks, D. D. (2011). Coaches' Panel Summary. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 20(1), 107-108. doi:10.1123/wspaj.20.1.107