Essay on Difference Between the Logos, Ethos, and Pathos

Academic research presentation gets construed as the act of offering or describing academic matters on an academic platform to a group of people. The group can either be small or large depending on the audience attracted by the presentation. Most presentation frequently employ the use of logos, ethos, and pathos to make them more appealing to the audience. Even though the application may not be denied, the three appealing techniques differ in specific ways. In academic research presentations, logos focuses on the logical appeals. It is mostly based on offering research evidence and allowing the presenter to master the skill of logical reasoning (Doman, 2016). Logos also assist in the presenter's analysis of his assumptions and avoid fallacies which may compromise the credibility of the academic research.

On the other hand, the ethos primarily gets based on various ethical appeals used in academic research presentation. They question the credibility of the academic research being presented and allow the audience establish specific connections due to its guarantee of fairness. In some situations, they relate to the logos due to the shared objective of the logical and ethical appeals. The combination of the two competently improves the art of academic research presentation. Lastly, the pathos focuses on the emotional appeals during academic research presentations. They help the person presenting to connect with the audience by applying various emotional techniques in the presentation. The method mostly employs the use of vivid concrete language in depicting a situation or an issue that has been researched. In most cases, research presenters get encouraged to use the technique when expressing particular emphasis and should not forget to warn the audience that on matters reasoning, the logos are best applicable as opposed to the norm where the pathos gets given priority (Mortensen, 2004).

Review of Saudi Arabia's most discussed vision 2030

On the part of the second question about the review of the most discussed vision 2030 of Saudi Arabia, it gets noted that the vision is based on the economic reforms which are also likely to bring political changes as well. For many years since Saudi Arabia became a kingdom in 1932, the royal household derived its wealth from the oil wealth. The situation made the country experienced severe economic challenges brought by the low prices in oil, a condition that has made the development of the vision 2030. The plan outlines frameworks of modernizing the economy and society and at the same time keeping its power stable. The plan also involves the more significant integration of the female gender and the youthful Saudi population into the economic workforce. The vision also saw the replacement of the Saudi Crown Prince with the son of Defense minister based on his ability to manage the country's war in Yemen (Naser, 2017).

One of the reports which got published by the Chatham publisher based in the United Kingdom indicated that the vision got influenced by the popularity of the Crowned Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Another senior researcher found in the same publishing company also argued about the inability of achieving the blueprint for Saudi Arabia's future economy due to the heated political situation in the land. The achievement of the vision requires every person from the political divide to ensure that it becomes conceivable by all citizens in Saudi Arabia. Lastly, other economic commentators across the globe also shared in the discussion that the plan will enable the promotion of both citizenry and entrepreneurial spirit of Saudi Arabians (Naser, 2017).

References

Doman, E. (2016). Departing from tradition. Place of publication not identified: Cambridge Scholars Publis.

Mortensen, K. W. (2004). Maximum Influence: The 12 Universal Laws of Power Persuasion. New York: AMACOM.

Naser, A. W. (2017). The National. Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030: Economic Reforms likely to bring political changes too.