Essay Example on the Augustinian Theory

Summarize Augustine's Epistemological Proof for God's Existence

Augustine's publication On Free Choice of the Will, Book II presents justifications cited from Descartes Meditation on First Philosophy of God existence. As to be illustrated, Augustine provides a modern outlook concerning the existence of GOD as one free energy directed by free will to be righteous.

Crucial points that Augustine epistemological proof provides on GODs existence indicates that GOD is the source of knowledge and energy of human survival. Augustine first proof on the existence of God coined from the proof that evil exists in the wide society. He shows that if evil exists then GOD the opposite of evil exist to regulate evil. Augustine presents the probability of an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God who creates aloof against evil. He further coins the originality of sin, followed by the destruction of free will, and later the commencement of evil as the beginning of evil. He shows the difference of evil as a byproduct of GOD creation and GOD procreation of free will (Hippo and Dods, 2012. He romantically visualizes a GOD who prefer to maintain righteousness and free will as well present theoretical construction on the existence of Hell. In fact, he explains that evil is different from GOD but is a consequence of godly creation that he explains as garbage from a creation of good. He foresees Hell as a physical punishment and a strong separation from GOD. The presentation of Free Will can be established on further works of Augustinian Theodicy that are found in Ascension Glossary, where GOD is discussed as a Free Energy, in a term noted as God's Sovereign Free.

Clearly, Augustine presentation on the existence of GOD as free will that exists in different social levels proves the assumption that GOD truly exists through the differences of good and evil that provides a range convincing justifications that GOD exists.

Summarize Augustine's refutation of skepticism

In different publications done by Augustine concerning Contra Academicos, Augustine presents contrasting epistemological and moral features that reveal Augustine attacks on Skepticism. He argues skeptical objectives were barely an unending maze of lacks of facts.

From a combination of different works, it is clear Skepticism play a major role in redeveloping Augustine career. The presence of ongoing philosophical dialogues known as Platonism presents a stronger skeptical attitude showing the different opinions on the purposes and projections of modern skeptical views. Skeptical views were a philosophical brainchild of the Hellenistic philosophical assumption that is often the far right opinions greatly engineered by "but" objectives (Hippo and Dods, 2012. They seek to present clean sheets of relevance most of which do not exist in the common world as we know it. Such views were essentially blocking Augustine work in engineering the truth. As such, Augustine adopted Socrates spirits of argument majoring his arguments on moral and constructive discussions that would help in creating a stable argument even where practical features were not present. Such creative approach would help theorize evidence as well better than a critique of skeptical ideas that dealt with an unending inquiry of facts. Augustine attack on skepticism involves integrating arguments on truancy that God engineered our cognitive faculties. According to Augustine, God created humanity with strong free will enabling humanity to have the knowledge of the world. Skeptics believe is subject to control and free will is part of that control agenda. However, Augustine explains the mental creation as one that surrounds a weighted argument on the existence of GOD.

As evidenced, Augustine attacks skepticism based on its weakness to provide the validity of truth. Much of Augustine work is drown from theoretical assumptions, but Plato Hellenistic philosophical objectives provide overarching concern in relation to profoundly unintended objectives.

Compare Augustine (likenesses and differences) with Descartes.

Introduction

Augustine and Descartes present creative theoretical justifications on the presence and the operations of GOD. As such, one believes the true presence and operation of GOD as that is dependent on ultimate knowledge. One draws similarities and differences of the two as explained below.

Similarities.

Both Augustine and Descartes attempt to fulfill a vacuum of unconcluded judgments and lack of senses. Augustine dwells on free thought, where the inner soul directs the moral thought. Augustine knowledge redirects senses and discussions. As such, it is possible to draw strong rationalization and stable understanding. Descartes, on the other hand, encourages the drawing of deeper conclusions based on fact-finding missions. Either way, the element of discussions unites both Augustine and Descartes into a common objective. Nonetheless, the two researchers seem to acknowledge the existence of God by appreciating their recognition.

Differences

However, first Descartes seems to be holding the skeptical plutonian view where he believes that all aspects doubted until proven true. The opinion is practically different from Augustine opinion where he encourages philosophers to draw conclusions based on senses. Such senses depend on the soul assumptions and direction. Augustine creates an inward nature he studies and arguments based on Socrates point of view, or possibly Neo-Platonism approaches. As such, Augustine seems to draw strong juxtaposition on space of religion as compared to the space of science a primary approach of Descartes.

Conclusion

Both Augustine and Descartes presents attenuate findings on the existence of God, as well Augustine does not discredit Descartes works but both seem to take a contrary opinion. However, as noted, Augustine and Descartes validate scientific inquiry of space religion and authority in the process of decoding the functionality of a human being.

Compare Augustine (likenesses and differences) with Plato.

Plato an almost different path from Augustine because much of Plato work based on the validity of science while Augustine work depends on validity of religion redirecting an energy field called free will, commonly known as consciousness. Either way, the two philosophers endeavors to maintain a central opinion on the sequence and validity of truth.

Similarities

Both philosophers believe that knowledge comes from an external crucial power towards motivating the thinking of humans. Both researchers are directed by questions that enable the development of great importance. These questions engineer common conclusion that provides an orientation of curious questions and answering of primary objectives. Either way, these questions are important in answering the genesis and nemesis of the truth of natural energy. Such natural energy helps in explaining the sequence and development of logical conclusions.

Differences

Nevertheless, Augustine and Plato differ in mode of approaching objectives. Augustine believes knowledge comes from God, however, Plato argues knowledge comes from within personal decisions. According to Plato, knowledge mentored within personal decisions, the pursuit of truth, and development of strong conclusions. Plato further emphasizes on the validity of opinion and knowledge where he explains the sequence of experiences based on the understanding and results surrounding humanity. According to Augustine, people should remain divine and God will reward them with knowledge, however, Plato believes knowledge comes within someone infinite energy.

Conclusion

Clearly, both philosophers have outstanding views concerning how an individual receives energy in form of knowledge. They both have a justified sequence and process of learning which revolves a learner posing diverse questions that allow the recalling of knowledge inside them. They both construct this assumption depending on how a person generates knowledge. However, the differences depend on how God gets involved in individual human experiences.

Compare Augustine (likenesses and differences) with the typically modern mind

Introduction

Augustine likenesses and differences have an influence on the typical nonprofessional modern mind given that unlike his times, the current times influencing several people reading such information. Elements such as Smartphone devices have revolutionized the thinking of the modern mind.

Similarities

From the discussion above, we can conclude Augustine directs findings on a theology of the cross and unique position where he rejects the different philosophical positions, by maintaining GOD is the infinite being and source of knowledge and free energy. The similarities noted with contemporary individuals are Gods grace enlightens knowledge, a close similarity are a composition of religious teachings currently practiced globally (Hippo and Dods, 2012. The differences presented justifies specific approaches towards the fundamental truth that an infinite being called God support reality.

Differences

However, the modern mind is gradually shifting from the type of GOD that Augustine presents. Communities such as UFO and Illuminati are holding contemporary different views on the existence of GOD. So far, there was a previous strong argument on the date of September 23, 2017, proving that a plane carrying a human being similar to the GOD of Augustine is moving around. As well, other philosophers are moving away from the free will and autonomous moral effect, common humane decisions gradually activates the thinking of modern man. Hence, the work of contemporary researchers, aided by the technological community has gradually motivated the growth of liberal objectives concerning the existence of GOD according to Augustine assumptions.

Conclusions

Clearly, the Augustine notion as held by modern philosophers is gradually taking a shift and turning gradually towards more liberal views being unveiled by Plato strategy on scientific proof. Technology has gradually improved the adoption of these changes.

What is the most distinctively?

Augustinian thesis in

Augustine thesis holds a strong biblical perspective, including the existence of GOD and free will. Two crucial and important philosophical points prove the Augustinian thesis, notably, reinforcing the opinion and knowledge about the existence of GOD. The accuracy of the Augustinian thesis does hold strong opinions held with strong philosophical points that help in creating stronger religion and ethics (Hippo and Dods, 2012).

Metaphysics

Augustinian thesis holds stronger objectives on the fundamental reality of nature. According to Augustine, GOD built and control nature through free will and righteousness and evil is a bi-product crippling the functionality of nature.

(b) Anthropology

Augustinian thesis appreciates that human is a product of biological evolution. By fact, nature is the working mechanics of GOD, not a difference with GOD. Augustine held a clear anthropological vision where the soul perfectly blends with the body. He justifies body-soul as unity in marriage while exploring the dramatic combat between the two relationships. He further argues the body as a three-dimension object, where the soul manages the management of the body.

Epistemology

Major work of Augustinian philosophy embodies religion, which he uses to decipher the source of knowledge. Epistemologists provide opposite an interesting problem solution where he creates strong assumptions and observations of GOD. In response to epistemology, he believes human intellect involves the flow of ideas as well as the generation of human intellectual view and the development of strong knowledge that allows the creation of strong processes and formation of observation.

Ethics

The Augustinian theory is a composition of strong ethics and genuine...