Analysis of Speech About Government - Paper Example

The speaker agrees that there is a problem where young generation are introduced into a sphere that belongs to 120 million people but is only controlled by 12 people. The people do not want to talk about this problem and insists that there is no problem to be discussed. The problems of America are hard to solve since solving them would ensure the big fortunes owned by a few are scaled down. Furthermore, the fortune would have to be scattered across all the people. Americans have a great government that they appreciate. They also have sound and appropriate laws that help in running the government. However, the drive and morals upon which the government was established have been greatly neglected. Also, through the constitution and independence declaration, all men were rendered equal and that they all enjoy rights to liberty, the quest of happiness and life. The equality of all is written in the scriptures with the expectation that everyone can read it. Scriptures are useful reference materials because they cannot be disapproved by any scientific research conducted by any mortal man. The scriptures further clarify the need for all resources to be scattered and those wrongly acquired to their rightful owners. In the US, there is greed where few men own everything as masses are starved. There are too much food and excess houses, yet the majority of people cannot afford to have them.

Currently, the US owns huge debts that would be difficult to pay. The government would use all the money they have currently to pay the debt almost 45 times to completely clear the debt. It is important to control the property being owned by various citizens in a country. According to Plato, one must not be allowed to be too rich as well as a man must not be left too poor. Various American statesmen among them Mr. Roosevelt and Mr. Hover once proposed the introduction if decentralization of resources. However, they need did anything to ensure that their philosophy was adopted for implementation. Of all the attempts made to scatter resources to all citizens, nothing has taken effect into the date.

Despite these problems being organized, solutions are introduced where serious campaigns are held titled Every man is a king' and Share our wealth society.' The other possible solutions to this gap between the rich and the poor is a possible establishment of a limit to the richness and poverty a man can experience. Furthermore, the boundaries in which one may work should also be limited. This is to ensure that there is not production beyond the stipulated amount. For the case of production, one is expected to produce as per the family consumption.

Discuss the organization of the speech (what organizational pattern did the speaker use -- Topical? Chronological? Problem/Solution? Narrative? -- how does this choice affect the speech?).

The speech was well organized and fundamentally informative. The speech took the format of a problem/solution arrangement. The speech openly listed some of the problems experienced and out rightly giving answers to them. Furthermore, the speech contained a brief history of the problems. It further outlined the solutions and the effect they had on people. This approach helped in identifying which of the solutions would be easy to implement. Through the speech, it was easy to identify which of the solution would be effective to dilute the problem. Finally, the solutions could be easily evaluated, and the most cost effective one identified.

Discuss the speakers delivery. What did he or she do well, and what could he or she improve?

The delivery of the speaker can only be evaluated depending on the content. The speaker was very knowledgeable of the topic hence was very detailed. He was consistent and used examples whenever necessary to drive his point home. The speaker also involved his audience but asking them questions regularly. This helps in getting and maintaining the attention of the audience.

Identify some of the persuasive appeals used by the speaker, including ethos, pathos, and logos.

What ethos or credibility did the speaker have before speaking? What did the speaker do during the speech to build ethos? (Communication in the Real World 11.4)

Describe some of the logical appeals the speaker used in the speech. Are there any fallacies? (Communication in the Real World 11.3)

How did the speaker use emotion, or pathos, to persuade? What motive appeals (i.e. cognitive dissonance, positive/negative motivation, appeals to needs, or fear appeals) does the speaker use to persuade or motivate his or her audience?

The ethos that was established by the speaker was being inquisitive. The speaker ensured that he developed a feeling in the audience of wanting to ask questions and find out what can be done to address the problems. Upon submitting the solutions, the speaker drove the feeling of action. The audience felt that they needed to act and solve the problems they were facing.

The speaker used some of the logical appeals when proving how difficult it was to pay the debt owned by the state. For instance, the debt to be paid by Americans was $272,000,000,000 but the amount the country had as per that time was $6,000,000,000 meaning that the country had to make payments almost 45 times. He further uses logical appeals to argue that it is advisable that men are not allowed to own too much well. For example, a man owning around $400,000,000,000 or $300,000,000,000 would be literary owning more than the country.

The speaker opines the statement of having 100 lunches which are then given all to one man to eat. This pathos is used to evoke emotions which make the audience see the same of limiting the amount being owned by one person. The speaker uses both positive/negative motivations throughout the essay. He discourages the audience for allowing people to own excessive wealth by encouraging limits to be set for rich men. They also set limits for poor people to avoid extremely poverty being witnessed. He further uses negative motivation to spike an action drive in the audience. He does this by comparing the enjoyable life rich people have vis a vis the miserable life faced by others within the same society.

References