Affection as an Aspect of Perception - Paper Example

How do we then perceive? And how do we get affected?

Husserl presents the claim that affection is an important aspect of perception. The view is that affection assists in making an elaboration on the degree that perception needs a theory associated with perceptual attention. He distinguishes between two conceptions of effect for the perceptual experience; one that passes through and coincides with consciousness (content of thought) and is interpreted to be tangible. The other conceptualization of perceptual attention is a non-representational affectively driven perception directly influencing the sensory flow without being regulated by content of thought (Bower 2017: 9).

Importantly as Sarah Ahmed argues, for one to be aligned in a particular manner is determined with how particular aspects become important and hence becoming objects that are part of me. It is important to note that the orientations are not personal. Spaces tend to be also oriented in which particular bodies are configured in this or another place. The orientations are also significant when looked at the perspective of corporeal or physical substance. Orientations tend to structure the corporeal nature of substances and anything that occupies space. Orientations tend to have an impact on the manner in which objects and subjects are materialized or be structured to perform the functions that they engage in. Orientations are viewed to be the manner in which surfaces of matter are directed or are aligned in particular ways (Ahmed 2010, pg. 235).

The object can be viewed as per the description presented by Husserl in which the object is approached through perception. Robert Sokolowski states, When we perceive an object, we do not just have a flow of profiles, a series of impressions; in and through them all, we have one and the same object given to us, and the identity of the object is intended and given; '8 Each new impression is connected with what has gone before, in the very form of an active "re-collection;' Significantly, the object becomes an object of perception only given this work of recollection, such that the "new" exists in relation to what is already gathered by consciousness: each impression is linked to the other, so that the object becomes more than the profile that is available at any moment. Given this, the sameness of the object involves the specter of absence and nonpresence. The analogy is that an object can be approached from different points in a single period and hence aligning with Husserls viewpoint that sameness is intended and not associated with any other factor. Be that as it may, when an object is the only substance that remains stationary during the flow of perception, the consistent nature of the table can be viewed as spectral. Husserl views phenomenology as approaching an object like it was foreign to which one can attend to the perception flow alone. It is perceived that the flow of perception illustrates the partiality of both presence and absence. In other words, what one cannot view is hidden from sight and hence only intended. An object can only be singled out by setting aside other objects to the edges of vision (Ahmed 2010, pg. 238-239)

According to Ahmed, a significant consideration is how an object may incorporate a background. The background, in this case, refers to parts which are found in the rear or parts of a picture illustrated at an interval, which enables that parts present in the background to obtain the shape that it illustrates. It is important to note that the definitions focus on the spatial nature of the background. The background can also be thought of as including a dimension which is temporal. For example, when narrating a story about an individual, the background of that person might be included. The background may include; what the story entails, is prompts and what might have happened in the past concerning the person. The family background might also be included to make part of the significant areas that shape the life of an individual from the time that one was born. The family, in this case, belongs to the social section of an individuals life (Ahmed 2010, pg. 239).

To appreciate the concept of phenomenology concerning attending the background converts into giving a record of the states of development for something, which would not be accessible in how that thing presents itself to awareness. On the off chance that we don't see, however, mean, an objects background, we may likewise not see, but rather intend, its experience in this transient sense. We have to confront an objects background, reimagined as the conditions for the development of not just the protest (we may ask: how could it arrive?) yet additionally the demonstration of seeing the question, which relies upon the landing of the body that sees. The foundation to recognition may include such entwining histories of entry. There is a history to the arrival of an object with the background marked by its coming to presence. What we have to review is the way the "thisness" of this present in an object lacks, in a manner of speaking, have a place with it: what is unique regarding an object; what can be told through its life story, is likewise what enables us to recount a bigger story: an account of how things become significant. It is important to note that histories of that sort are not simply accessible on an objects surface, aside from some flaws that may be deserted, which could likewise be thought of as what's abandoned. In other words, histories are ghostly, much the same as Husserl's "missing sides," (Ahmed 2010, pg. 240-243).

Putting into consideration Husserl's table, Husserl does not appear to be moved by the table. His eyes appear to be doing all the activities despite him grasping his table regarding the series of impressions. The table is viewed as consisting of more than can be viewed at a given time. Husserl closes his eyes and then opens them. The partiality of an object can be viewed even when the object is not present in a single view. He views bodies as something touching which is touched" (vol. 2, ISS), which implies that we touch objects and that we are also touched by objects. In other words, Husserl puts into view the nearness amongst objects and bodies as significant aspect seeing that they establish and leave a connection (Ahmed 2010, 245).

We may imagine that we go after all that simply comes into our sight. What is accessible particularly depends on the introductions we have effectively made. A few articles don't move toward becoming objects of observation since the body does not push on them. In other words, they become "beyond the horizon" of the body and hence distant (Ahmed 2010, pg. 245).