Essay Example on Lego Architecture

Significant research has been done with regards to Lego architecture and is considered as a sub-brand as well as product range of the Lego construction toy that focuses on celebrating the present, past and future of architecture through the Lego brick. The concept of Lego architecture was incepted by Adam Reed Tucker, who sought to develop a method that can integrate his two passions of architecture and art. It is during this process that the idea of using Lego bricks popped up. He founded the brick structures corporation and began to build and design models of famous landmarks. Architects drew their roots from Lego, while employees realized a manner to build upon their teenager days dreams (Jenson & Saint-Martin, 2006). The Lego brand in Denmark has found its way into millions of homes globally after being developed in the early 1930s. Legos building blocks which come in different colors, shapes, and sizes (Langton & Longbottom, 2012). Legos blocks have circular holes that bulge from the surface of the block enabling plastic construction workers to interlock the pieces to create different designs. Since the inception of the Lego brand, any inspiring inventor can redevelop famous pieces of architecture. There have been many cities that have been built by Lego bricks.

Legos are mostly used as a hands-on way of teaching students throughout drafting and design courses around the globe ascertaining that they can be used at different ages both for learning and fun. The majority of teenagers at one point have at least built a house, a car or a tower from Lego buildings (Antorini, Muniz Jr, & Askildsen, 2012). They foster creativity and innovation of children as they develop and build the toy which they want to play with. They are not only durable but are also removable thus making them ideal throughout child development (Jenson & Saint-Martin, 2003). Since some of the pieces are often tiny, it is the responsibility of the adult supervisor to ensure that teenagers and children do not put the small bricks in their mouths.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is clear from the above discussion that architecture and photography. Architecture has been determined as an excellent theme for photographic processes which were introduced during the 1830s by William and Daguerre. As at this time, the majority of the buildings were acquiescent to the extended exposure periods needed two kinds of architectural photography were identified: the perspective and the elevation with the perspective approach being perceived as photography as an extension of the architectural rendering presenting fine details of the art. The above discussion focused on examining the significance of photography in practice and in theory of architecture through assessing the past architectural photographers thoughts, attitudes as well as perception towards design as well as its construction.

From the discussion, it was determined that the first architecture photograph was released by Niepse. There are differences between old and new architecture photography, and the change is attributed to technological advancements. Some of the techniques that have been determined that are now being embraced include the elevation approach. Lightning has been determined to be an essential aspect of architecture photography.

It has also been determined that despite the positive changes in architecture, it is a blessing in disguise accruing some challenges. The challenges include the adoption of technology especially when the implementation cost is much higher. Another challenge is about the need to train more architecture photographers. The future of architecture photography is bright as there are many enhanced technological advancements. As at now, modern photography embraces multiple approaches which have helped them in fostering the visibility as well as the quality of the photographers. Overall, it has been determined that indeed there have been a lot of changes in architecture photography.

References

Langton, M., & Longbottom, J. (Eds.). (2012). Community futures, legal architecture: foundations for Indigenous peoples in the global mining boom. Routledge.Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2006). Building blocks for a new social architecture: the LEGO paradigm of an active society. Policy & Politics, 34(3), 429-451.

Antorini, Y. M., Muniz Jr, A. M., & Askildsen, T. (2012). Collaborating with customer communities: Lessons from the LEGO Group. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 73.

Jenson, J., & Saint-Martin, D. (2003). Building blocks for a new welfare architecture: Is LEGO TM the model for an active society. RC-19 of the International Sociology Association, August, University of Toronto.