Presentation Example: Managerial Leadership Development

4 pages
905 words
University of California, Santa Barbara
Type of paper: 
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

The impacts that accompanied the revelation Volkswagen cheating emission test scandal created an impact on the organization performance. The main challenge that lies with the organization concerning the topic was about the managerial leadership development, existed at that time and needed to be addressed. The problem had not been a question of the top most leadership overseeing an unquestioning culture whereby challenging decisions and transparency were ignored. According to Evan (2015), the employees described the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Martin Winterkorn, as a dictatorial creating fear culture among his employees. This culture was the main contributing factor because people did not have the courage to express their concerns to the top management. Senior administrators did not completely comprehend the complexities of the items being utilized; and that standing up and testing choices were verifiably disheartened. The similitude amongst Volkswagen and the managing an accounting emergency at that point, at that point, lies in the path in which the common initiative style constrained the stream of data and nature of open deliberation inside firms.The rising challenge to this issue is basically on leadership. There is a need for the top management to ensure that they know about everything that goes on within the organization for the simple reason of making good decisions and encouraging team work that ensures a better management development. This is a trial of leadership and a period for leadership leadership that is true, unassuming and resolved to improve, the Level 5 Leaders Jim Collins discusses. From our examination instrument Cultural Advantage, we realize that pride in your organization and trust in leaders are two of the most vital factors in building an elite culture, two things that are staggeringly harmed at Volkswagen.

The substance of good hazard management is posting fitting inquiries and finding honest solutions. And along these lines, according to Jung (2017), if a CEO doesn't make it clear that he anticipates that exploitative conduct will be outed by Chiefs posting extreme inquiries, at that point it presumably won't be outed. This obviously didn't occur at Volkswagen, where an organizational culture that has been contrasted with that of North Korea kept representatives from raising issues that endangered eager objectives figured by senior management.

Volkswagen needs leaders who will tell the truth, recognizing what turned out badly and resolved to present appropriate reparations. They have to make a culture that is centered on everyone doing their best each day and making the best choice, where everyone knows about and put resources into securing the Volkswagen brand and notoriety. They have to revamp pride and trust in their organization, from the back to front. I need to hear stories from representatives about how Volkswagen is putting things right, stories that show how their leaders are humble and consistently revamping certainty (Evan, 2015). It is important to see the officials, who have delighted in the benefits of leadership now show others how its done.

The administration culture debilitated the individuals from the supervisory board to acknowledge negative information of their ventures and to withdraw a bombing strategy. Moreover, the culture improved the leadership style of Winterkorn, which was known for underlining new item advancement and deals development, as opposed to responsibility and supportability of the organization (Jung, 2017). It was profoundly conceivable that the incorporated management style, with little impact from outside voices, added to the scandal. The organization had an environment ready for reproducing the scandal: close knit official board with a solid basic leadership control and an engraved culture of threatening vibe against environmental directions.

Viable leadership requires relationship building abilities, which empower leaders to fabricate affinity, trust, responsibility, and powerful communication. Enthusiastic insight decides how much an individual can recognize their sentiments and besides the sentiment others. Leaders with a high passionate insight can connect with others utilizing sympathy, honesty, resistance, and a feeling of coordinated effort. Both Piech and Winterkorn had engineering foundations, which could have formed their leadership style to concentrate on points of interest and smaller scale management (Evan, 2015). Their experiences could make it difficult for them to be liberal, adaptable, and versatile to different assessments. Such despotic leadership and communication styles could be viable in the mass assembling period where taken a toll viability, in light of rapid executions of standardized, top-down requests, was the need. Conversely, the present business environment points out for an assortment of issues, counting incorporation of mechanical engineering skills with information advances, environmental insurances, geology, and system network.

In such a mind boggling business environment, neither organizations nor leaders can identify and ace all important information. Close communication and coordinated effort with workers who have learning and readiness to acknowledge other specialists' conclusions is a key to progress. The progression towards viable management does not stop at an individual director's push to upgrade his or her participative leadership style. It was additionally essential to incite a corporate culture where everyone over the management chain of command felt welcome to share what worked or did not work. This free trade of information could enable the organization to wind up plainly more inventive and viably address new demands from the business.



Evan, T. (October 1, 2015). What Leaders Can Learn from the Volkswagen Emissions Scandal? Retrieved August 15, 2017, from

Top, C. A. L. L. C. (November 06, 2015). Volkswagen Emission Scandal: TDI Diesel Engines Recalled. Top Class Actions, 2015-11.

Jung, J. C. (January, 2017). Volkswagens Diesel Emissions Scandal. Thunderbird International Business Review. 2-31.


Have the same topic and dont`t know what to write?
We can write a custom paper on any topic you need.

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the website, please click below to request its removal: