The organizations or business internal environment primarily refers to its integral elements which entail the current employees, management, and the corporates social morals which stipulates the ethics within the organization. The revolutionizing business trends modalities of operation have in the recent past created a drastic shift in the social corporate responsibility paradigms (Morrison, 2006). The profit notion motive of different firms has recently embodied the fundamental aspects of corporate social responsibilities. These critical dimensions include the economic, ethical, legal and the philanthropic or social responsibilities. These mainly comprise the concepts of organization evaluation, suitability, feasibility and acceptability assessment paradigms.
The economic concept in the context of corporate social roles envisages the fact that every business venture should primarily hit the turning point. The expansion and sustenance of business employees and social responsibilities significantly attribute to the profitability of the firm. The concept of adhering to the legal dictates stipulated by the law is also a key concern in the corporate roles. Legal responsibilities embody the security regulations, the criminal laws and the rules governing the environmental sustenance (McDonald, 2014). In light of the economic and legal obligations, the company presumes the responsibility of assessing the ethical decorum which also an integral in its operation. Ethical responsibilities involve the attributes that the firms stakeholders concisely feels believes are the right thing to do. These could include paying the employees a substantial wage, addressing the dressing code, working hours, business partners span or the environmental perceptions the stakeholders could opt to steer. Also, the philanthropic roles are an integral part of the corporates deliverables once the stakeholders feel that the threshold of the firm can support behold its essential needs. Here, the organization extends its operations by initiating beneficial projects to the society or offering donations to charitable platforms.
Predominantly, the organizational perceptions of corporate social responsibilities may significantly differ in different approaches. For instance, the philanthropic responsibility erupts from the firms management consensus of which in some cases some organizations might opt not to initiate any societal based project. More so, the economic and legal dictates of the agencies might differ based on the initiatives of the mission and objective of the venture (Johnson, 2013). For instance, most of the non-profit organizations rely on the donor funds thus are not profit oriented. The corporate social responsibilities are integral components of the organizations parameters of operation.
Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., Regner, P. (2013) Exploring strategy Text & Cases. Harlow, England: Pearson.
McDonald, S. (2014). Social responsibility clusters arising from social partnerships. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(2), 331-347. doi:10.1108/srj-12-2012-0152
Morrison, J. (2006). The internal business environment. The International Business Environment, 3-35. doi:10.1007/978-0-230-20957-2_1
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the collegeessaywriter.net website, please click below to request its removal:
- Motivation Techniques - Paper Critique Example
- Performance and Management of Engaging Personnel - Paper Example
- Application For Strategy Consultant Position - A Cover Letter Example
- Negotiating Between the Management of Westleigh Hotel Services and the Union
- Creating a Welcoming Workplace for the Older Worker in Healthcare Industry
- Steps in Solving the Conflict - Essay Example
- Thompson Technologys Management - Paper Example